Usefulness of specialized regional cardiac arrest centers

2017-08-22
Bernd W. Böttiger

References

Monsieurs KG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL, et al; ERC Guidelines 2015 Writing Group. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:1-80. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.038. Epub 2015 Oct 15. PubMed PMID: 26477410.

Should we organize specialized regional cardiac arrest centers?

Bernd W. Böttiger: We have very clear signals from different registries and trials that patients following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest should be transported to a center where percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) facilities are working 7 days a week and 24 hours a day. PCI is indicated in many of these patients, and besides that we do recommend temperature management, adequate prognostication, and also a specific caseload per year with cardiac arrest patients, because all of this is associated with an improvement in outcome. If you have a hospital which is professionally doing all these different things, we should call it a cardiac arrest center. Therefore, in the new guidelines we recommend this kind of hospitals where a professional approach is brought towards the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients and we call these centers cardiac arrest centers.

So, to answer your question, yes, we should have regional hospitals, specialized hospitals, where we can bring our cardiac arrest patients from the out-of-hospital setting.

We would love to hear from you

  • Do you have any comments?
  • Have you found a mistake?
  • Would you like to suggest a feature?

We use cookies to ensure you get the best browsing experience on our website. Refer to our Cookies Information and Privacy Policy for more details.